The Field

Customer Reviews

64 Ratings

Overall Ratings

  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 Stars
    40
  • 4 Stars
    10
  • 3 Stars
    5
  • 2 Stars
    6
  • 1 Stars
    3

Sorted By Most Useful

5 out of 5 stars
By Diana on 22-05-09

Interesting

An interesting read into the relationship between new and old science. The book looks at how long held scientific ideas have come to perhaps hold back new emerging ideas into quantum physics. Lyn Mctaggart takes a journey with the reader and explores the quantum field.
This may challenge those set in their ideas!

Read more Hide me

4 of 4 people found this review helpful

2 out of 5 stars
By Wuzzle on 14-06-15

Not The Actual Book

What would have made The Field better?

It's very interesting but it is not clear that you don't get the whole book, just a very condensed version. I wish I have bought the physical book now.

Read more Hide me

2 of 3 people found this review helpful

1 out of 5 stars
By Stuart on 24-02-13

Pseudo Science

I'm interested in the theory of the Holographic Universe. An interesting story to begin with, but there is little science here. Cherry picking pseudo scientific studies that support the beliefs of the author is not scientific proof of the paranormal. Psychic activity, remote viewing, the power of prayer has never been proven scientifically.

Read more Hide me

4 of 7 people found this review helpful

5 out of 5 stars
By Amazon Customer on 21-04-18

A great read<br />

Loved every minute. Easy to listen to and very interesting. This is the first book that I have had by this author and it has left me looking for more. Very impressed.

Read more Hide me
5 out of 5 stars
By Alana Murrey on 08-09-17

So much information

Excellent book which totally works with my beliefs of the cosmos we live in.

We are all part of the energetic cobweb

Read more Hide me
2 out of 5 stars
By Paul on 30-07-17

No great addition to what I knew already

What disappointed you about The Field?

I chose this book as I have heard of the author before and thought it would be a useful reference. I was hoping that this book would really dig down into the background, concepts and contemporary science (that is not perhaps already out there) and become a 'come to reference'. Instead it is more of a summary of the subject.

You didn’t love this book--but did it have any redeeming qualities?

It is a summary of sorts from my perspective

Read more Hide me
Page 1 of 2