Regular price: £9.69
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for £9.69
What did you like best about Love's Forever Changes (33 1/3 Series)? What did you like least?
There were a few nuggets in this short book that I was unaware of. It is interesting that Arthur Lee had seen Marat/Sade multiple times and drew inspiration from it. Hulkrans rolls the dice on other possible points of inspiration, including existentialism (heavily), Buddhism (briefly) and the gnostics (a curious tangent). While it's possible that Lee had this depth of academic knowledge when he was composing the lyrics for Forever Changes, the author is indulging in a LOT of guesswork. Granted, Arthur Lee was a mysterious figure who did not yield his secrets easily, so it may have been difficult to find more clues about Lee's direct inspiration. Hulkrans also focuses HEAVILY on the dark side of LA, including mysticism and the Mansons. I understand why Hulkrans would want to allude to Manson and Altamont, demonstrating that Lee was prophetic about human nature and the fall of the hippie, but too much time is spent discussing events that happened years after this album. Also, I hear conflict and, at times, cynicism, in Arthur Lee's lyrics, but Forever Changes is also about hope as well. The optimistic side of Forever Changes does not get an equal airing. The analysis in this book focuses more on the assertion by Alban “Snoopy” Pfisterer that the group should have been called "Hate." Cited information about the actual crafting of the album and the music can probably fill less than 5 pages.
Has Love's Forever Changes (33 1/3 Series) turned you off from other books in this genre?
I like Geeta Dayal's book on Brian Eno's Another Green World. You can't really pass judgment on the entire series, because the quality of each book depends on the bias of the author.
What about Jeremy Beck’s performance did you like?
I thought Beck's performance was good.
Any additional comments?
I will never listen to this book again. Hulkran's take is interesting, but a lot of the information is tangential and probably would have been better suited to an op-ed piece. The book would have benefitted from more straight journalism.