Regular price: £29.99
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for £29.99
Would you listen to Enhancing Human Capacities again? Why?
Yes, it has diverse topics with detailed information, so in the future I may skip between chapters based on what I'm interested in at the time, but there are so many interesting topics, perspectives, and pieces of information that I will likely come back to this.
What was the most compelling aspect of this narrative?
Some compelling concepts are medicine being proactive to enhance life instead of focusing mainly on disease, some of the possibilities for the near future, and also, for me at least, some of the more philosophical topics brought in at the end.
What about Gregory Gorton’s performance did you like?
For material that can be dry because of its complexity, but also interesting because of it, the tone is an appropriate balance between neutral tone, quick pace, and expressiveness.
Was there a moment in the book that particularly moved you?
I've been exposed to them before, but I find subjects such as to what extent a person would retain their personality if they could effectively live forever and the possibility of inorganic consciousness fascinating.
Any additional comments?
Many parts of this may be more dry, complex, and philosophical than many people will enjoy, but for those interested in things like history and interpretation of the Chinese Room thought experiment this is worth listening to all the way through. Even if you happen to disagree, this is thought provoking material.
Would you try another book from Julian Savulescu and Ruud ter Meulen and/or Gregory Gorton?
Has Enhancing Human Capacities turned you off from other books in this genre?
No but I will tread more carefully.
If you could play editor, what scene or scenes would you have cut from Enhancing Human Capacities?
Almost all of it. There is nothing about the tech. It's all about the ethical pondering on things they barely talk about. They ramble on and on about some will think this, while some will think that. blah blah blah. All the while not discussing the tech or how it may be used so never really getting to anything concrete. People need stories. Tell us about the tech or the people who's lives will be advanced by the tech. Or how it will be misused.
It's like Philosophizing why people might be unhappy with you murdering a loved one instead of the story about a love triangle gone wrong ending in murder. One is interesting the other is a good reason to kick someone in the balls. You know which is which.
Any additional comments?
philosophy is not Science end of story.
1 of 2 people found this review helpful