Let There Be Light presents a simple, beautiful, and elegant view of the oneness of all life, subjective and objective. It demonstrates the unity of the physical world with conscious experience of the physical world. Consciousness is not inside space and time, space and time are within consciousness; they are a special structure of the perceptual portion of consciousness.
Author Stephen Hage explores enigmas in physics which still exist and cannot be satisfactorily explained. He explains why the "Dimensional Structure" of consciousness is a new paradigm that can help us to better understand how the universe works - as Copernicus did when he shattered the myth that the sun orbits the earth, rather than the other way around.
Conversational and friendly, this audiobook presents a new myth and paradigm for understanding consciousness. It is intended to be a valuable resource for the intelligent lay person interested in the deep and meaningful connections between consciousness, physics, quantum mechanics, myth, and meditation.
We've sent an email with your order details. Order ID #:
To access this title, visit your library in the app or on the desktop website.
Starts off strongly, introduces well the mind-boggling perplexity of Quantum Physics.
After a strong start, author throws in a chapter about meditation. Alarm bells. Later chapters are more of a rambling sermon than proper exposition of the author's proposed 'myth'.to replace the Cartesian model of the universe. I got well lost. I've nothing against the author trying to come up with a theory to explain the universe, but if it can't be expressed in easier language than this - at times it is almost wilfully obscure - then I'm afraid it has very little chance of success. If you are the author and you see this - may I suggest - ditch the meditation chapter and instead take the time to explain your screens more coherently and in shorter sentences (it's hard to listen to long sentences that go in and of and around the thing that was once referred to having past it on and in and of the earlier part of this sentence, for example).
Often sounded bored. Intonation completely wrong at times (e.g. under-pinings instead of underpinnings).made clumsy sentence structure even harder to grasp.Partly I think reader not to blame because you need to understand the material to know where best to pause and take a breath, and not many will have the time to understand the material. Probably better to get the author himself to perform it, Once he's re-written it.
Absolutely not. Silly question for this kind of book.