Regular price: £20.39
Buy Now with 1 Credit
Buy Now for £20.39
What did you like most about Patience with God?
Frank Schaeffer exposes the flaws of evangelical Christianity, secular atheism and himself in this no holds barred analysis of all three.
What other book might you compare Patience with God to, and why?
As odd as it may seem to those who know their family history much of what I read reminded me of the work of Frank's father Francis Schaeffer.
What about Frank Schaeffer’s performance did you like?
Being the author Frank brought a personal quality and intimacy to the reading.
Did you have an emotional reaction to this book? Did it make you laugh or cry?
I found the book challenging, revealing and at times humorous.
Any additional comments?
Whilst not necessarily agreeing with much of the content I thoroughly enjoyed and highly recommend this book.
0 of 1 people found this review helpful
Schaeffer writes clearly and passionately. His own history is the true subject of the book. He is thoughtful but also cutting in his critique of the new atheists, but he is completely unsparing in his contempt for "evangelical fundamentalists" who represent the childhood against which he rebelled. His utter lack of empathy toward those who seem to be like his father leads to an unjust portrayal of Rick Warren, for example. He idealizes Marine Corp. boot camp because his son became a Marine and writes beautifully about his love for his granddaughter. He consciously and selectively idealizes the Greek Orthodox tradition, but that is perhaps understandable. This is about him, after all.
10 of 10 people found this review helpful
Have always enjoyed Frank Schaeffer's previous material. But this is not what you call "a home run". Nonetheless, he did make a few valid points. As an agnostic I find myself fighting the "atheist" label a nebulous task. So many presumptions that I prefer to use the term "non-theistic".(note: Many people just scratch their heads when they hear that term. Works for me as it avoids knee-jerk confrontations). Anyway, for the most part Schaeffer is right to criticize Hitchens and somewhat lesser so Dawkins and Harris. They can get somewhat overly demanding. On the other hand Dennet has a much different demeanor than the others. In Dennet's work," Breaking the Spell", you'll find that he bends over backwards to accommodate a theistic view. He merely thinks there may be ways to measure the religious experience in a more objective manner. Here is where I differ from Schaeffer who appears to use an emotionally simplistic appeal that falls a little short. Regardless of my opinion about this book , I still admire Schaeffer's courage to speak out in the public domain as he has for years.
4 of 4 people found this review helpful